31 July 2008

The Foundry Industry -- A Recent History

In TSMC sees good Q2 but Expects Slowdown we noted some of the successes of TSMC and how TSMC project only a 4% growth over the next quarter. The Financial Times, in response to TSMC releasing their financials, has an excellent article on the last downturn in the industry when most industry experts believed TSMC would battle to survive. The FT argues the situation is now reversed and TSMC is very well placed to struggle through the next downturn. According to the FT:

TSMC, the world’s largest contract chipmaker, predicted flat sales and a slight squeeze on margins in the current quarter. Nevertheless, many analysts are keeping their overweight or buy ratings on the stock. They argue that, if anyone can survive, grow and make money in this industry, it will be TSMC.

Five years ago, the opposite appeared likely to happen.

TSMC and United Microelectronics (UMC), its smaller Taiwanese peer, invented and built up the business of contract chipmaking. The foundry industry, as it is known, thrived for more than a decade before the Taiwanese groups started facing competition. Chinese companies moved in at the low end of the foundry business while IBM started offering services at the top end.

By 2003 iSuppli, the market research group, warned that TSMC’s market share was slipping. Media reports started predicting that IBM would muscle its way to the top whereas TSMC and UMC would be squeezed out.

IBM had succeeded in snatching orders from some key TSMC and UMC customers such as Nvidia, Xilinx, Analog Devices, AMD and Broadcom. Meanwhile, Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Smic), China’s largest contract chipmaker, squeezed in to rank fifth among the global foundries.

Robert Tsao, then UMC chairman, even predicted the demise of the existing foundry model.

But, says Ming-kai Cheng, head of technology research at CLSA, “they were all wrong”.

China has not become a meaningful player in chip manufacturing nor have big integrated players such as IBM captured leadership in the industry.

Instead, TSMC has now pulled far ahead of everybody else. Over the past five years it has been the only foundry that has managed to hold on to its market share, remain cost-competitive, enhance technological capabilities and shield its profits from cyclical downturns.

Due to TSMC continue expanding their service and focusing on developing their capabilities, Mr. Cheng was quoted as saying "TSMC now looks more like Intel than like UMC.." The FT also says IBM have lost 3.5% of their market share (6.1% to 2.7%) and that both Chartered, the Singapore foundry, and UMC, the no. 2 foundry are both far behind TSMC. The FT further argues the low cost Chinese foundries are beating each other out of the market and that soon there will be fewer players. The FT also looked at the deregulation of investments in fabs in China (seeMr. Ma please don't move the fabs to China) saying it won't make much of a difference since UMC has apparently said China bound investments are not a priority. Afterall, as we argued in No 10G AUO Plant in China , China-bound investments are still strategic business decisions, not legaslative.

TSMC without doubt single handedly changed the landscape of the semi-conductor industry. They are one of Taiwan's best companies and continue to lead in the semi-conductor fabrication industry. Taiwan should be proud of this world class company and I certainly hope sensibility prevails and that both TSMC and UMC will not charge into China as soon as the new laws are passed. Histroy suggests TSMC have made the right moves at each stage of the game in their 20-year history. Lets hope they continue to do so.

Financial Times: TSMC set to forge a path through gloom

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Man that's great. A really good look back at the recent history of the semiconductor manufacturing industry. Mr. Tsao broke Taiwanese law going to China, regardless of what the law is now, and he as completely wrong about the future semi industry too.

TSMC is a machine, when you have all the best people, you are really tough to beat.

Paul said...

Hi There,

Yes, I thought the article was interesting too and I was especially surprised to see Robert Tsao's remarks on the semi industry then. He did break the law and I think he destroyed a lot of confidence in UMC (as witnessed by an ever declining share price). Jackson Hu has stepped back at UMC and someone else is now in charge.

I really do hope UMC can pull things back though. I have no problem with them and I do believe they are a very important company in the Taiwan tech landscape.

As ever, thanks for your insightful comments and participation on my small, niche blog.

Its appreciated.
Paul

Anonymous said...

Yes for sure. There definitely needs to be someone to keep TSMC on its toes. And actually, UMC did make some very good bets on fabless chip design firms, even if it didn't run its fab business very well in the meantime.